I just listened to your podcast. Thanks for the additional detail, but it confirmed my above assumption that the emphasis with all are on revenue streams. Thanks
Unfortunately two of the three ‘Chicago’ links are paywalled by Crain’s Chicagobusiness. I noticed the Harris proposal only had the CPD increasing their contribution. There weren’t enough details to understand why other pensioner groups weren’t being asked to increase contributions or how much of an increase the recommended CPD contribution is from current levels.
Without reading the others I am not 100% confident in the next statement but, I assume no one said the Illinois Constitution needs to be revised to remove/revise the text “… the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.”
I just listened to your podcast. Thanks for the additional detail, but it confirmed my above assumption that the emphasis with all are on revenue streams. Thanks
Sorry CPD and CFD.
Unfortunately two of the three ‘Chicago’ links are paywalled by Crain’s Chicagobusiness. I noticed the Harris proposal only had the CPD increasing their contribution. There weren’t enough details to understand why other pensioner groups weren’t being asked to increase contributions or how much of an increase the recommended CPD contribution is from current levels.
Without reading the others I am not 100% confident in the next statement but, I assume no one said the Illinois Constitution needs to be revised to remove/revise the text “… the benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.”